Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Joe Vieira <address@concealed>
- To: Mark K <address@concealed>, "address@concealed" <address@concealed>
- Subject: RE: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:32:30 -0500
>That's interesting since I would think it more common to do the
>opposite (feed sympa from LDAP). Not to pry, but why do you want sympa
>driving LDAP? What else will you use those LDAP groups for?
I actually want both,
so if we write directly to ldap, i would like sympa to use that and then if
we make a change using the sympa interface, i would like that to be reflected
in ldap. i.e if we add a user to a mailing list, i want that pushed back
into ldap.
it's all about keeping everything in sync from all directions, does that make
sense?
Joe
-
[sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Joe Vieira, 01/16/2008
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Mark K, 01/16/2008
-
RE: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Joe Vieira, 01/16/2008
- Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa, Mark K, 01/16/2008
-
RE: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Chris Andrews, 01/16/2008
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Joe Vieira, 01/16/2008
- Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa, Mark K, 01/16/2008
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Joe Vieira, 01/16/2008
- Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa, Thomas Berry, 01/17/2008
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Olivier Salaün, 01/22/2008
- Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa, Joe Vieira, 01/22/2008
- Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa, Joe Vieira, 01/22/2008
-
RE: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Joe Vieira, 01/16/2008
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Patrick von der Hagen, 01/17/2008
- RE: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa, Joe Vieira, 01/17/2008
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Ldap updates from sympa,
Mark K, 01/16/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.