Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

en - [sympa-users] Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?)

Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: <address@concealed>
  • To: address@concealed
  • Subject: [sympa-users] Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?)
  • Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 00:16:58 +0100

Hi Folks,

I never did hear anything back on this - has anybody else seen this problem?
Does it look like a bug that needs to be reported?

Thanks,

Miles Fidelman



Olivier Salaün - CRU wrote:

Miles Fidelman wrote:

Just got this in my inbox.

*From: *SYMPA < address@concealed <mailto:
address@concealed>>
*Date: *November 19, 2006 7:27:23 AM EST
*To: *Listowners <" address@concealed <mailto: address@concealed>,
mfidelman"@fidelman.net>
*Subject: *****SPAM*** FYI: signoff list fusn from
address@concealed <mailto: address@concealed> *

FYI command signoff list fusn from address@concealed <mailto:
address@concealed>

Disregarding that I can't seem to figure out why messages from sympa
are getting marked as spam by my anti-spam filters (that's a different
issue)....

This list has two listowners - and it sure looks like sympa is
creating
a malformed To: header (look at where the " marks are inserted). What's
particularly weird is that both of us received the message properly.

Has anybody else seen this? If so, it's a bug, but a weird one.

Can you check how these two list owers are defined in your list config
file
?

owner
reception mail
profile privileged
email
address@concealed
gecos Miles Fidelman

owner
reception mail
profile normal
email
address@concealed
gecos Jud Leonard




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page