Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
[sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?)
- From: Miles Fidelman <address@concealed>
- To: Olivier Salaün - CRU <address@concealed>
- Cc: address@concealed
- Subject: [sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?)
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:26:05 -0500
Olivier,
The mailto: entries are an artifact of Seamonkey's mail reader, and my cutting and pasting. Sorry about that.
If I look at the message as text, what I'm seeing is this:
To: Listowners <"address@concealed, mfidelman"@fidelman.net>
which is clearly malformed. And seems to be the case across at least several, if not all of the lists on our server.
The admin_table entries look just fine.
As you suggest, I'll add an entry to the bug tracking system.
Thanks,
Miles
Olivier Salaün - CRU wrote:
Hi Miles,
We didn't notice such strange things on our server. I'm really wondering where do those "mailto:" prefix come from ?
Could you check your admin_table DB table ?
Please submit an entry in our tracking system, so we keep track of the problem.
Thanks.
address@concealed wrote:
Hi Folks,
I never did hear anything back on this - has anybody else seen this problem? Does it look like a bug that needs to be reported?
Thanks,
Miles Fidelman
Olivier Salaün - CRU wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Just got this in my inbox.
*From: *SYMPA < address@concealed <mailto:
address@concealed>>
*Date: *November 19, 2006 7:27:23 AM EST
*To: *Listowners <" address@concealed <mailto: address@concealed>,
mfidelman"@fidelman.net>
*Subject: *****SPAM*** FYI: signoff list fusn from
address@concealed <mailto: address@concealed> *
FYI command signoff list fusn from address@concealed <mailto:
address@concealed>
Disregarding that I can't seem to figure out why messages from sympa
are getting marked as spam by my anti-spam filters (that's a different
issue)....
This list has two listowners - and it sure looks like sympa is creating
a malformed To: header (look at where the " marks are inserted). What's
particularly weird is that both of us received the message properly.
Has anybody else seen this? If so, it's a bug, but a weird one.
Can you check how these two list owers are defined in your list config file
?
owner
reception mail
profile privileged
email address@concealed
gecos Miles Fidelman
owner
reception mail
profile normal
email address@concealed
gecos Jud Leonard
-
[sympa-users] Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?),
mfidelman, 12/06/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?),
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 12/07/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?),
Miles Fidelman, 12/07/2006
- [sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 12/08/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?),
Miles Fidelman, 12/07/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Re: Re: is this a but (is anybody else seeing this?),
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 12/07/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.