Developers of Sympa

[Scott Balmos <address@concealed>]

Moving over to the dev list, now that I'm subscribed there also...

Out of curiosity, what other changes do you think are still needed? As 
far as I could tell, the patches cover what's necessary for extending 
Sympa itself. I have yet to check WWSympa, or extend the templates. 
Those are probably the ones needing robot hostname additions, or maybe 
changing the parser to put list@robot instead of just list for the 
[list.name] template tag.

I'm looking at the rest of the code this morning, and I'll see what I 
can do.

--Scott

Olivier Salaün wrote:

> Hi Scot,
>
> We are currently working at making the full virtual robot support 
> available, as a background job. The changes are important, including 
> the ones you suggested.
>
> We have currently done more than half of the job. We'll send more 
> information about these developments in the sympa-dev mailing list. 
> We'll also think about creating a CVS branch for it ASAP...
>
> Scott Balmos a écrit :
>
> > I'll admit I'm looking at what Cef is suggesting. Though I'm already 
> > having to do that kind of a naming scheme in the background for 
> > Postfix to be happy. It ain't pretty. :)
> >
> > You know what they say about Open Source... If you have an itch, 
> > scratch it. Attached is a proposed patch against 5.0b1 which 
> > implements full robot tracking in the database and (hopefully) all 
> > internal data structures, queue filenames, etc. See below for the 
> > summary list of changes. I have yet to really try this on my box... 
> > It passes a smoke test, as far as I can tell.
> >
> > Comments, criticisms, etc greatly appreciated, especially if I missed 
> > anything (task_manager I'm worried about, for some reason). I had a 
> > few hours to kill, this problem was a showstopper for my system's 
> > setup, etc etc etc. I just hope I didn't royally screw anything and 
> > end up getting flamed off the list. :)
> > [...]