List for people interesting in developping and using Sympa packages

[David Verdin <address@concealed>]

Oh, and I'll take care of your patches. :)

Le 11/12/11 13:29, Xavier Bachelot a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 12/05/2011 02:30 PM, David Verdin wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Some people from the French community have done a big deal of work on
> > Sympa RPM lately.
> > Maybe you could join your efforts on maintaining the Sympa RPM for the
> > RedHat family?
> >
> > Particularly, Xavier Bachelot could get the package to be published in
> > RedHat and Fedora repos. They are looking for package reviewers.
> Thanks for mailing sympa-packagers@, I should have done that myself 
> earlier. I wasn't even subscribed as the list seemed awfully quiet, 
> but now I am :-)
>
> All Sympa build and run time dependencies are in Fedora and EPEL now 
> (I've pushed perl-Unicode-LineBreak to EPEL stable minutes ago), it's 
> been a very long task (I think I started pushing sympa dependencies 
> more than 2 years ago...).
> Now, Sympa itself needs to be reviewed. If there are Fedora packagers 
> reading this list, I would appreciate if you could help review it.
> Please note the the package still needs improvements and some features 
> needs to be added like the SystemD unit scripts, etc...
>
> I am shipping the package with 2 patches that might be worth 
> incorporating upstream. First one adds a configure switch to allow 
> changing the location of the static directory.
> The second is more simple and not ok for upstream as is, it changes 
> the place where the mail templates and web templates are installed.
> The 2 patches are attached to this mail, let me know what you think.
>
> Also, I've found out about Ikeda's own sympa packages only a couple 
> weeks ago. I need to take a deeper look and merge his work into my own 
> spec. Ikeda, if you're reading this, I'll be glad to read your 
> comments. Maybe we could co-maintain Sympa in Fedora/EPEL ? We've 
> already exchanged a few mails through the CPAN bug tracker when I was 
> packaging some of your perl modules ;-)
>
> The Fedora package review is here :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705382
>
> Thanks and sorry for the late answer.
>
> Regards,
> Xavier