The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

[David Verdin <address@concealed>]

Indeed a higher log level would be useful.
However, this lack of information provides us an information: the message was not rejected on the basis of an authorization scenario evaluation: it would have been logged.

Please check whether the message contain an antispam header tagging it as spam.

Anyway, we should issue a message explaining the rejection, So we rellay need logs with an increased log level and, if it does not contain critical / personnal informations, the message incriminated if want to fix this lack of logs.

Regards,

David

Le 10/02/11 22:25, András Bendzsák a écrit :

Here is the log entry for a message I tried to move from 'bad' to 'msg' queue.

Feb 10 16:45:08 mlist2.is.ed.ac.uk sympa[18043]: [ID 702911 local1.notice] main::DoFile() Processing /address@concealed ; sender: Madeleine Frances Walder <address@concealed>
Feb 10 16:45:08 mlist2.is.ed.ac.uk sympa[18043]: [ID 702911 local1.notice] Moving bad file address@concealed to bad/

It doesn't really explain why the message is considered bad.

Try to increase the debug level!

--
David Verdin
Comité réseau des universités

Due to the limitations of human brain, I fail to remember all the mails.
So if you want your bug reports or feature requests for Sympa to be processed, please post them to the Sympa tracker

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature