The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

[Olivier Salaün <address@concealed>]

Janusz S. Bień a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007  David Verdin <address@concealed> wrote:
>   
> > Janusz S. Bień a écrit :
> >     
> [...
> > > Looks like signed messages are never urlized. Is this intentional
> > Yes.
> > When we urlize a message, we alter its content. Altering a signed 
> > message can mess up the signature (for example, an MD5 footprint).
> > We then do our best not to change a single byte in such messages, which 
> > rules out the urlize mode.
> >     
> It's logical, but I would prefer a different behaviour.  I would like to use 
> the signatures only to distinguish trusted users from those who have to 
> confirm their messages by mail.
>   
Coping with S/MIME signed message is not easy : we cannot alter the body 
of these messages in any way, otherwise we would break the signature. 
Therefore most Sympa reception modes that imply altering the messages 
are incompatible with S/MIME signed messages.
> How difficult would be to achieve this?
>   
Do you mean removing the S/MIME signature if the message has been 
changed by Sympa ?
I'm not sure we want to do this...
> What are actually reception/ditribution modes? Are they hard-coded in the 
> source? In List.pm perhaps? I have only a rudimentary knowledge of Perl :-(
>   
You should look for references to 'urlize' in List.pm to find the 
related code.