Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
- From: Olivier Salaün - CRU <address@concealed>
- To: Nigel Kersten <address@concealed>
- Cc: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-users] is suidperl really required?
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:41:22 +0100
Hi Nigel, Actually we changed this notification in the next release : ##################################Maybe we should even discourage this solution (that had the advantage of been quite transparent for the listmaster). Another solution that we didn't explore yet is using Sudo to run wwsympa setuid. Any feedback is welcome.... Nigel Kersten wrote: I'm trying to put together a package installer for sympa for Mac OS X, and in the course of re-installing, I've noticed I had this error: ################################## ## You don't have suidperl installed. ## Suidperl is required to run WWSympa with SetUID. ##################################################### >From browsing around, this kind of line seems to be what the Perl people say about suidperl at the moment... --------from Perl Changes 5.8--------- Note that the security scare is only relevant for those who arefoolish enough to build suidperl (which is now officially discouraged) -------------------------------------- Is it really required? Apple aren't distributing perl with suidperl, and it seems like other vendors are stopping it too. |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-
[sympa-users] is suidperl really required?,
Nigel Kersten, 11/22/2005
-
Re: [sympa-users] is suidperl really required?,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 11/22/2005
- Re: [sympa-users] is suidperl really required?, Nigel Kersten, 11/22/2005
- Re: [sympa-users] is suidperl really required?, Mark Duling, 11/22/2005
-
Re: [sympa-users] is suidperl really required?,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 11/22/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.