Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Soji Ikeda <address@concealed>
- To: Alexandre Franke <address@concealed>
- Cc: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 16:09:55 +0900
Hi AlexandreFranke,
2018/08/19 1:12、Alexandre Franke <address@concealed>のメール:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 4:12 PM Quentin Gliech
> <address@concealed> wrote:
>> Banning spammers wont do anything because they usually don't reuse their
>> nicks and they change hostnames regularly.
>
> Indeed. FWIW on GIMPNet the network operators have banned a whole
> range of IP and that was quite effective, but it had the side effect
> that a few real people got banned as well as they were running their
> bouncer off the same Google compute thing as the spammers come from.
>
>> Instead, I'd suggest to prevent unregistered users to talk (+q $~a),
>> which turned to be quite effective in other channels I'm in.
>
> That can alienate a non trivial amount of people too. It would work
> but have a side effect similar to the range ban described above.
>
>> See https://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201808/fighting_spam_on_freenode.html
>
> The solution described as day 3 in Julien’s comment seems to be a good
> compromise. Let’s implement that one.
It looks good, but anyway, ops flags are needed by regular members, because of
reasons I wrote, and to see “unvoiced” people (due to +z), don’t they?
Regards,
— Soji
> --
> Alexandre Franke
> GNOME Hacker
>
-
[sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Soji Ikeda, 08/17/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Quentin Gliech, 08/18/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Alexandre Franke, 08/18/2018
- Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel, Soji Ikeda, 08/19/2018
- Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel, Soji Ikeda, 08/18/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Alexandre Franke, 08/18/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Quentin Gliech, 08/18/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.