Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Alexandre Franke <address@concealed>
- To: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:12:33 +0200
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 4:12 PM Quentin Gliech
<address@concealed> wrote:
> Banning spammers wont do anything because they usually don't reuse their
> nicks and they change hostnames regularly.
Indeed. FWIW on GIMPNet the network operators have banned a whole
range of IP and that was quite effective, but it had the side effect
that a few real people got banned as well as they were running their
bouncer off the same Google compute thing as the spammers come from.
> Instead, I'd suggest to prevent unregistered users to talk (+q $~a),
> which turned to be quite effective in other channels I'm in.
That can alienate a non trivial amount of people too. It would work
but have a side effect similar to the range ban described above.
> See https://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201808/fighting_spam_on_freenode.html
The solution described as day 3 in Julien’s comment seems to be a good
compromise. Let’s implement that one.
--
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker
-
[sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Soji Ikeda, 08/17/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Quentin Gliech, 08/18/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Alexandre Franke, 08/18/2018
- Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel, Soji Ikeda, 08/19/2018
- Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel, Soji Ikeda, 08/18/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Alexandre Franke, 08/18/2018
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] IRC channel,
Quentin Gliech, 08/18/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.