Developers of Sympa

[David Verdin <address@concealed>]

Le 06/11/12 16:11, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
> Le 06/11/2012 15:36, address@concealed a écrit :
> > +    ## Compatibility: $robot may be a string
> > +    unless (ref $robot) {
> > +    if ($robot and $robot ne '*') {
> > +        $robot = Robot->new($robot);
> > +    }
> Backward compatibility desirability is quite discussable here. I'd 
> personally would prefer to trace back any part of the code calling 
> this function, and fixing them once for all, but that may me 
> considered a bit invasive :)
>
> Can we aim to a compromise, and keep this part, but with a deprecation 
> warning ? Somrthing in the line of
> carp "deprecated usage: robot parameter should be a Robot object";
Looks good to me. This way, we would have a good start at generalizing 
the usage of Robot object, but it would leave us time to track parts of 
the code using the robot name only.
> David: could you change the default reply-to for the sympa-commits 
> list to sympa-developpers, instead of no-reply ? Thanks.
Done, my good sir. ;)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME