Developers of Sympa

[Mark K <address@concealed>]

Upon looking at it further yesterday, I think that the transport and
regexp for owners is unnecessary.  Normally, a 'list-owner' alias points
to /home/sympa/bin/bouncequeue with 'list@robot' as the argument, not
'list-owner'.  Unless there is something else going on under the hood,
wouldn't the owner transport as described in the automatic list setup
not work?

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:23:10 +0200
Olivier Sala__n <address@concealed> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
> Sylvain Amrani will be the right person to react on your changes,
> since he implemented the automatic lists feature and wrote this part
> of the documentation. I hope he is in the sympa-dev list.
> 
> Anyhow, thanks for taking the time to update the manual.
> 
> Mark K a __crit :
> > After having done some work on my own site with this, I have
> > modified
> > https://www.sympa.org/manual/list-families#automatic_list_creation
> > to reflect some extra work that needs to be done.  Postfix will
> > reject email to unknown recipients by default, so you also need to
> > account for that when doing automatic list creation since you want
> > postfix to accept mail for aliases that do not yet exist.  So I
> > added this line to main.cf in the example on the wiki:
> > local_recipient_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/local_recipient_regexp
> > unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
> >
> > And then:
> > /etc/postfix/local_recipient_regexp
> >       /^.*-owner\@lists\.domain\.com$/  1
> >       /^auto-.*\@lists\.domain\.com$/   1
> >
> > Now, I also corrected what I think was an error.
> > The /etc/postfix/transport_regexp example had this line:
> >
> > /^.*+owner\@lists\.domain\.com$/      sympabounce:
> >
> > Which I think should be:
> >
> > /^.*-owner\@lists\.domain\.com$/      sympabounce:
> >
> > Notice the - instead of +.  Sympa does not use an extension for
> > owner emails.
> >
> > Also, I think that the 
> >
> > /^.*\@lists\.domain\.com$/            sympa:
> >
> > line in transport_regexp is unnecessary unless there is more going
> > on in this example than is mentioned (virtual domain or
> > something).  Not only is is not necessary, but it would be
> > destructive if lists.domain.com contains anything but sympa lists.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> >   
> 


-- 
Mark K