Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Olivier Salaün - CRU <address@concealed>
- To: Jeff Abbott <address@concealed>
- Cc: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-dev] Keeping up with Sympa
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:31:38 +0100
Jeff Abbott wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:27 PM, John-Paul Robinson wrote:
I'd like to start keeping closer tabs on the latest work going on in Sympa and am wondering how best to do this. Would it be OK to work with the CVS HEAD in order to have access to your latest work (and build my edits around that) or is the HEAD generally unstable. I'm not looking for production-level stability here, but I would expect things not to blow up.We're using 5.1.2 here, and on our production server we intend to only track released versions of Sympa -- our test server may be running anything from a released production version to HEAD to a specific rev, depending on what we need on any given day for testing purposes. I'd probably avoid using HEAD for production use, but I tend to be somewhat conservative in stuff like this and we have the good fortunes of having a test environment, so your needs may vary. I confirm that running a CVS unidentified (HEAD of anything else) is a bad idea because we don't guarantee that it includes atomic changes and you can't assume that the code was fully tested. Moreover if anything goes wrong, you can't put a name on the version you are running. Unless you know what you are doing, you should only run packaged versions that come as a tar.gz. We will release a new beta version of Sympa these days. This version provides :
We are currently adding other features that will make a later 5.2b.1 :
|
-
[sympa-dev] Keeping up with Sympa,
John-Paul Robinson, 02/27/2006
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Keeping up with Sympa,
Jeff Abbott, 02/27/2006
- Re: [sympa-dev] Keeping up with Sympa, Olivier Salaün - CRU, 02/28/2006
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Keeping up with Sympa,
Jeff Abbott, 02/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.