Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Jeff Abbott <address@concealed>
- To: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:40:57 -0400
On Oct 28, 2005, at 5:09 AM, Olivier Salaün - CRU wrote:
It sounds like you don't have a proper solution for your migration problem and you're not the first who is facing it. Therefore we've added a new sympa.conf 'return_path_suffix' parameter in Sympa development branch. Attached is a patch that you can probably apply on a 5.1 release. This should allow you to use a diff'erent suffix for return path and use the -owner suffix to contact list owners.
I hope this meets your needs...
Olivier,
This is fantastic! Thank you very much! While I do tend to agree with Serge on minimizing the number of configuration options and do inwardly wonder whether or not simply changing the return path from either a hardcoded $LISTNAME-owner or $LISTNAME$return_path_suffix to another hardcoded address ($LISTNAME-bounces or $LISTNAME-return, for instance) might be better, this should do the trick.
Thanks again,
Jeff
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-
[sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun,
Jeff Abbott, 10/27/2005
-
Re: [sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun,
Adam Bernstein, 10/27/2005
- Re: [sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun, Jeff Abbott, 10/27/2005
-
Re: [sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 10/28/2005
- Re: [sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun, Jeff Abbott, 10/28/2005
-
Re: [sympa-dev] More -owner Versus -request Fun,
Adam Bernstein, 10/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.