Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Sergiy Zhuk <address@concealed>
- To: Aumont <address@concealed>
- Cc: Olivier Salaun <address@concealed>, sympa-dev <address@concealed>
- Subject: Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:54:46 -0800 (PST)
hi
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Aumont wrote:
> No. Sympa keep in memory a cache of subscribers only for lists using
> file or
> include data_source. Afeter the first which command, all subscribers are
> cached
> and the process size should not grow.
Looks like this is my case...
I don't have many of "include" lists, but still, 98Mb for sympa and 58Mb for
each wwsympa process, and task_manager about the same size is way too much.
It's rather slow when you start sympa too, and there're conflicts accessing
the DB cache which sometimes lead to 'unknown list' case.
I guess, the patch which will use the database for everything (includes),
will help.
Do you have that patch already or it needs to be implemented from the
scratch ?
It's becoming more and more important for my installation, so if it needs to
be done from the scratch, I could probably implement it.
We have to agree on how it should work first though.
I guess, the original idea was to make task_manager do all the includes and
use an additional field in the database to detect the data source for every
subscriber.
--
rgds,
serge
-
sympa memory management,
Sergiy Zhuk, 03/06/2002
-
Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management,
Olivier Salaun, 03/06/2002
-
Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management,
Sergiy Zhuk, 03/06/2002
-
Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management,
Aumont, 03/08/2002
- Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management, Sergiy Zhuk, 03/08/2002
-
Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management,
Aumont, 03/08/2002
-
Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management,
Sergiy Zhuk, 03/06/2002
-
Re: [sympa-dev] sympa memory management,
Olivier Salaun, 03/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.