Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

en - [sympa-users] anyone else using Enterprise DB?

Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dan Pritts <address@concealed>
  • To: address@concealed
  • Subject: [sympa-users] anyone else using Enterprise DB?
  • Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:53:37 -0500

Hi,

if you are successfully using postgres/EnterpriseDB with sympa 6.x
please reply.

Details:

We use EnterpriseDB, a commercial product based on postgresql. In the
interest of keeping everything on one db platform I'm working to put
our new sympa 6.0.1 installation on enterprise DB.

I've run into one issue. For some reason, connecting to Enterprise DB, the
postgres schema name is being returned as "public" including double quotes,
rather than public without quotes. This doesn't appear to break sympa
operations but does break the database check in Upgrade.pm.

e.g., the contents of $dbh->tables looks like:

"public".admin_table

rather than

public.admin_table

This was simple to fix once I found the existing check for table names
with public. prepended in Upgrade.pm.


More importantly, while debugging this, I noticed lots of explicit
checks for table structure and such with MySQL and SQLite, but nothing
so specific for any of the other "supported" databases.

I am guessing that the core development team uses mysql and sqlite but not
the other databases. This makes me nervous - I do not want to be
running an important service on a poorly-supported database platform.

I am not religious about EnterpriseDB/Postgres, if necessary I'll just
use MySQL for sympa. However, I would prefer to use EnterpriseDB if it's
not too much work.

So, if you are using Postgres with sympa 6, please reply.

thanks!
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224

Internet2 Spring Member Meeting
April 26-28, 2010 - Arlington, Virginia
http://events.internet2.edu/2010/spring-mm/



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page