The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

[Kartik Subbarao <address@concealed>]

Thanks David!

        -Kartik

On 03/03/2010 03:41 AM, David Verdin wrote:
> Hi Kartik,
>
> That' clearly a bug. There's no point checking the existence of the
> owner parameter if there is an owner-include. I guess the trouble comes
> from the way Sympa checks the configs : parameters are checked one by
> one, so if a parameter is mandatory, a log is issued. We must introduce
> dependencies between parameters, which would allow to use the equivalent
> of the logical "or" : it is mandatory to define the parameter x OR the
> parameter y.
> also, we should not try to synchronise owners when they exist already.
>
> I added a bug report regarding this issue:
> https://sourcesup.cru.fr/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6715&group_id=23&atid=167
>
>
> We'll work on that but, as it represents a change in a cire
> functionnality of Sympa, it won't be added to Sympa before the next beta
> release.
>
> regards,
>
> David
>
> Kartik Subbarao a écrit :
> > On 02/25/2010 06:56 PM, Christian Dahlhausen wrote:
> > > Just a gut feeling, but maybe it helps just to add an owner entry in the
> > > list config file.
> >
> > I appreciate that that could be a temporary workaround if this is a
> > bug in Sympa, but I'm hoping to first characterize this issue
> > properly. The whole point in using owner_include is so that I *don't*
> > have to hardcode the email address of any owners manually in the
> > config file.
> >
> > > Maybe the parameter is mandatory but as long as it has
> > > an owner from where ever (owner_include in this case) it could be fine.
> >
> > I don't understand this sentence.
> >
> > > I found that having more load on logging (just increasing the log level)
> > > decreases the Sympa (wwsympa) performance significantly.
> >
> > Yes, that's my concern. I have log_level set to 0 and I'm still seeing
> > these messages. I'm hoping one of the Sympa developers can respond on
> > this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Kartik