Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
- From: Jeff Abbott <address@concealed>
- To: Olivier Salaün - CRU <address@concealed>
- Cc: address@concealed
- Subject: [sympa-users] Re: Sender header?
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:55:31 -0500
On Nov 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Olivier Salaün - CRU wrote:
We never considered adding this header field until your raised the point.
There seem to be some controversy though :
http://www.greatcircle.com/list-managers/mhonarc/list-managers. 199712/msg00081.html
Hmm. That's interesting, and I hadn't previously seen it. I wonder if that's a guideline designed to apply only to lists for IETF traffic and communication, though.
What do your users use the Sender: header field ?
Could they use either List-Id or X-Loop instead ?
It is, as Dale mentioned in a later message, mostly for the convenience of users who've already set up filters, though I suspect there may be some MUAs and some filter software out there that makes it easier to filter on Sender: than on List-Id: or X-Loop:. Also, the user who brought this to my attention has several Outlook users on her list, and Outlook displays messages with Sender: headers as e.g.:
From Sympa List <address@concealed> on behalf of John Doe <address@concealed>
This makes it trivially easy for those users to identify where the message came from. Perhaps this could be a per-list setting? Or... hmmmm. Could I use the existing custom_header list option to accomplish this? I overlooked that before, but it might do the trick for the small handful of lists that request it.
Thanks,
Jeff
-
[sympa-users] Sender header?,
Jeff Abbott, 11/09/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Sender header?,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 11/14/2006
- [sympa-users] Re: Re: Sender header?, Dale Ghent, 11/14/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Sender header?,
Jeff Abbott, 11/21/2006
- [sympa-users] Re: Re: Sender header?, Olivier Salaün - CRU, 11/21/2006
-
[sympa-users] Re: Sender header?,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 11/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.