Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

en - Re: [sympa-users] Re: List-Id field, RFC 2919 compliant ?

Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Luc Brouard <address@concealed>
  • To: address@concealed
  • Subject: Re: [sympa-users] Re: List-Id field, RFC 2919 compliant ?
  • Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:49:10 +0100

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:39:04AM +0100, Olivier Salaun - CRU wrote:
> You're absolutely right, we had misread the RFC.
>
> It has been fixed in our CVS tree :
> http://listes.cru.fr/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/sympa/src/List.pm

I think also that a reminder (before upgrading to this version) should
be sent to the list you are running with sympa as it might well break up
filters set tup by your subscribers to sort incoming mails automatically
(via maildrop/sieve/procmail or any other filtering method).
If you have very heavily used ml., your users will be happy not to have
everything going into their inbox.

As List-Id is the obvious choice when filtering a ml from sympa.


REgards
Luc
>
> Thanks.
>
> Antoine Delvaux wrote:
>
> >I'm currently using Sympa v3.3.3 and I'm a bit surprised by the format
> >of the List-Id field being like the one of an email address. For
> >example, for this list it is <address@concealed>. Following RFC 2919,
> >shouldn't it be <sympa-users.cru.fr> ?
> >
> >I checked in the code and it is indeed the way it is coded, the
> >behaviour of this list is not because of the use of a customer header.
> >
> >Is there any particular reason for not following the RFC 2919 ? Is this
> >behaviour the same in newer versions ?
> >
> >Reference : http://rfc.sunsite.dk/rfc/rfc2919.html
>
> --
> Olivier Salaun
> Comite Reseau des Universites
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page