Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

en - Re: [sympa-users] Expereinces with large Sympa installations?

Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Olivier Salaun <address@concealed>
  • To: Harald Wilhelmi <address@concealed>
  • Cc: address@concealed
  • Subject: Re: [sympa-users] Expereinces with large Sympa installations?
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:40:58 +0200

Harald Wilhelmi wrote:

> at the moment I'm evaluating mailing list solutions for a
> large intranet. The scenario looks roughly like that:
>
> 40000 users
> 4000 mailing lists
>
> The biggest problem with the old system (hacked Majordomo+home-brewed
> Web interface) is slow operation of certain admin tasks in the
> web interface. It's believed that this is just caused by the fact
> that UNIX file systems need sequential searchs to find files in
> large directories (with 4000 entries...). If that's the problem Sympa
> might have the same problem. However I believe that there must be more
> because this data should be quite well chached (I-node cache + name cache).
>
> My Sympa installations were a lot smaller so far.
> Has anyone experiences with Sympa in installations of this size?
> Esspecially concerning performances of the web interface?

I did experimentations on our dev. server with 4 000 and 40 000 lists ;
there were all identical lists, pointing to the same config file :
(our server is a PIII 730 MHz, mem=263Mb, SCSI disks)

* with 4 000 lists
Everything works at usual speed for all web functions including
the WHICH function that goes trough all lists to parse config
files.

* with 40 000 lists
Every operation concerning a single lists (INFO, ADMIN, REVIEW,...)
works as
fast as usual. BUT 'WHICH' operation (searching all subscriptions for
a user)
is really too slow.


Though, we are interested in experiences of sites running Sympa with
thousands of
MLs and related performences.

Thanks

--
Olivier Salaün
Comité Réseau des Universités



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page