Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?
- From: Luc Didry <address@concealed>
- To: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:39:55 +0100
mercredi 27 février 2019, 14:27:48 CET IKEDA Soji wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I worry that, if comments were included in display name, it could form
> a bit long text run. According to recommendation by RFC, long run in
> header field should be folded, for example,
>
> > From: “IKEDA Soji (address@concealed via sympa-developpers mailing”
> > “list)” <address@concealed>
>
> It could mess some poorly implemented MUAs which would treat the first line
> of field content as an e-mail address.
>
> (Note that my name with chinese characters must be encoded using MIME “b”
> method, display name can easily be longer than example above and folding
> can occur more frequently.)
>
Okay then, since RFC says so, no pb for me (that's exactly why I
posted that message before creating a patch).
Thank you very much 🙂
--
Luc
"La route est longue, mais la voie est libre…" https://framasoft.org
Framasoft ne vit que par vos dons (déductibles des impôts). Merci d'avance
pour votre soutien https://soutenir.framasoft.org
-
[sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?,
Luc Didry, 02/27/2019
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?,
IKEDA Soji, 02/27/2019
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?,
IKEDA Soji, 02/27/2019
- Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?, Luc Didry, 02/27/2019
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?,
IKEDA Soji, 02/27/2019
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] Problem in rewrited sender gecos?,
IKEDA Soji, 02/27/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.