Developers of Sympa

[David Verdin <address@concealed>]

Hi,

I have no opinion on any tool as I never authored any CPAN module.

How do cool Perl developers maintain their modules nowadays?

Regards,

David


On 27/02/2018 12:14, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> hello,
>
> are some people against the use of dzil to maintain packages like
> Task::Sympa and Sympatic ?
>
> i wasn't full time job perl developer since circa 2011. at this time,
> dzil was a very good alternative to module-starter. now it seems
> new tools happened and some people became just fan of maintaining
> modules via the edition of Makefile.PL and cpan-upload.
>
> i have no opinion on that. i started to use Makefile.PL to avoid new
> dependencies in the build process. On my own, i'll go to dzil just
> because i remember it saves me a lot of time and it is easy to share
> good practices from one project to one other (just updating modules).
>
> i'll be glad to read if any of you have an opinion about it.
>
> regards
> marc

--
"Mieux vaut viser la perfection et la rater que viser la médiocrité et 
l'atteindre."
- Francis Blanche

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature