Developers of Sympa

["address@concealed" <address@concealed>]

Hi Soji,

According to your response, I know that giving an estimated delivery  
date is somewhat difficult since most sympa community members are  
working on it during their free time.

However does it mean that this feature is included in the roadmap ?

Best regards
Fred.

On 05/22/2017 08:02 AM, IKEDA Soji wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 07:53:23 +0200
> "address@concealed" <address@concealed> wrote:
>
> > Hi soji,
> >
> > Sounds good :)
> >
> > But it raises more questions (sorry for that):
> >
> > * Is there any chance to get it in a roadmap ? With an estimated ( ;) )
> > delivery date ?
> I can't figure out. Delivery date may be dependent on your passion. :)
>
> > * From your point of view, do you have any idea how much time (in days,
> > full time) it would require for a non core sympa expert (but with dev
> > skills) ?
> It's difficult to estimete man-hours to complete implementation.
>
> However, I said we can modify a few things "and look what will
> happen".  Such things are:
>
> * In lib/Sympa/Tools/Text.pm:
>    * sub canonic_email
>
> * In lib/Sympa/Regexps.pm:
>    * regexp addrspec
>    * regexp email
>
> That's all for the moment.  I think you can begin immediately.
> Then, would you please share your experiences among us?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Soji
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > On 05/15/2017 07:40 AM, IKEDA Soji wrote:
> > > Hi Fred and all,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 15 May 2017 07:30:49 +0200
> > > "address@concealed" <address@concealed> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Soji,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply.
> > > >
> > > > Some of our users are facing some issues because they are not able to
> > > > register email addresses with non ASCII characters.
> > > >
> > > > In my opinion, since the RFC 6330 (which is referenced by RFC6783) is
> > > > now more than five years old (February 2012), we can expect that those
> > > > kind of addresses will become more and more widely used (this feature is
> > > > now offered by most of email providers like gmail).
> > > >
> > > > I think it is important to get this feature in the roadmap.
> > > >
> > > > However looking at your analyze, it seems that you plan to address the
> > > > full scope (as defined by RFC6330).
> > > > I am far from an expert in that domain but I assume that this could be
> > > > split up in several milestones and one of them could be the support of
> > > > such email addresses.
> > > I agree.  My report is slightly idealist.
> > >
> > > > Do you have any idea how much work this single step would require ?
> > > I guess we may start with users' e-mail: There are a few functions
> > > and regexps to verify and canonicalize format of e-mail.  We can
> > > modify them and look what will happen.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > -- Soji
> > >
> > > > Thanks for your time
> > > >
> > > > -- Fred
> > > >
> > > > On 05/06/2017 01:20 AM, IKEDA Soji wrote:
> > > > > Developers,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have investigated this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > <https://listes.renater.fr/sympa/arcsearch_id/sympa-developpers/2015-10/20151007173229.15955535a8b1d3a106ca2eb7%40conversion.co.jp>
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it worth adding this to Sympa 7/8?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > -- Soji
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 3 May 2017 12:04:23 +0200
> > > > > "address@concealed" <address@concealed> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have a very short question about the RFC6783 (Support of Non-ASCII
> > > > > > addresses).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This feature was planned to be included in the 7.0 (probably a long time
> > > > > > ago).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you give me an update on this:
> > > > > > * I did not find any 7.0 branch so I assume it has been canceled
> > > > > > * Is there any active/planned work on RFC6783 implementation ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your time
> > > > > > Best regards