Developers of Sympa

[Guillaume Rousse <address@concealed>]

Le 29/07/2014 04:47, IKEDA Soji a écrit :
> # The phrase "I cannot answer a hypothetical question" is usual
> # play of bureaucratic people.  Could you please stop such a
> # offensive reply?
Rejecting technical arguments as offensive will indeed make discussion 
easier.

> Besides, I just presented _an example_ for a contrapositive of
> Kerckhoffs's principle: Private key must not fall into enemy hands.
Sure. No compromise. Let's defend against martian interventions too.

> For more example, it may not be our pleasure that a company refrain
> from adopting Sympa based on code audit by them, isn't it?
My pleasure would be than Sympa would be auditable at all. Which implies 
to make it readable first.

> > > FIFO (I don't stick to this method, though) does not store
> > > passed information to any perpetual storages.  I suppose that is why
> > > openssl supports FIFO.
> > openssl doesn't make any difference between a regular file and a fifo
> > for this matter, but this doesn't change much here.
>
> BTW I rethought on this issue and decided to use Crypt::SMIME.
Fine. No need to discuss anything anymore then.
--
Guillaume Rousse
INRIA, Direction des systèmes d'information
Domaine de Voluceau
Rocquencourt - BP 105
78153 Le Chesnay
Tel: 01 39 63 58 31

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME