Developers of Sympa

[IKEDA Soji <address@concealed>]

Hi,

On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:05:49 +0100
Guillaume Rousse <address@concealed> wrote:

> Le 13/01/2014 23:52, IKEDA Soji a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> >> --- trunk/src/bin/arc2webarc.pl.in 2014-01-13 16:05:56 UTC (rev 10152)
> >> +++ trunk/src/bin/arc2webarc.pl.in 2014-01-13 16:34:48 UTC (rev 10153)
> >> @@ -4,9 +4,11 @@
> >>   # $Id$
> >>   
> >>   # Sympa - SYsteme de Multi-Postage Automatique
> >> -# Copyright (c) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Comite Reseau des 
> >> Universites
> >> -# Copyright (c) 1997,1998, 1999 Institut Pasteur & Christophe Wolfhugel
> >>   #
> >> +# Copyright (c) 1997-1999 Institut Pasteur & Christophe Wolfhugel
> >> +# Copyright (c) 1997-2011 Comite Reseau des Universites
> >> +# Copyright (c) 2011-2014 GIP RENATER
> >> +#
> >>   # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >>   # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >>   # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >>   Modified: trunk/src/bin/crypt_passwd.pl.in (10152 => 10153)
> > 
> > A range of years doesn't have exactly same meanings as a list of
> > each years, although I'm not a jurist and can't explain strict
> > reason.
> We're not redacting a legal document here, and I'm unwilling to perform
> such as change for such kind of reasons. But feel free to do it if you want.

We _are_ reducting legal document.  If we argue that our software is
"free software", in other words, it will be licensed under copyleft,
our arguement contains it should be published and distributed
according to GNU's way.

So, you _must not_ say "feel free to do it if you want".
_We_ _should_ do it as GNU's guideline says.
  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html

I believe things are simple: We would apply license we chose to our
software.  Conversely, if you neglect meaning of licensing about
free and/or open source softwares, I am ready to discuss with you,
even if it will last for years.

> >> sympa[10152] trunk/src: [dev] enforce uniform file header
> >> Revision 10152 Author rousse Date 2014-01-13 17:05:56 +0100 (lun. 13 
> >> janv. 2014)
> >> Log Message[dev] enforce uniform file header
> >> Modified Paths
> > 
> >> +# -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*-
> >> +# vim:ft=perl:et:sw=4:textwidth=78
> >> +# $Id$
> > 
> > I found a worried side-effect on vim: Newlines are automatically
> > inserted into long strings.
> Yes, that's the point of 'textwidth' setting, which is part of our
> coding policy. I've no objection to remove it if it hurts, tough. I'm
> myself feeling it a bit too much invasive.

I'm adjusting the script posted yesterday, because several
exceptional cases are thought not to be fixed automatically.

As the same, I guess "ts=78" is too strict setting to apply
automatically.

Regards,

--- Soji

> -- 
> Guillaume Rousse
> INRIA, Direction des systèmes d'information
> Domaine de Voluceau
> Rocquencourt - BP 105
> 78153 Le Chesnay
> Tel: 01 39 63 58 31
> 


-- 
株式会社 コンバージョン  セキュリティ&OSSソリューション部   池田荘児
〒231-0004　神奈川県横浜市中区元浜町3-21-2 ヘリオス関内ビル7F
e-mail address@concealed  TEL 045-640-3550
http://www.conversion.co.jp/