Developers of Sympa

[IKEDA Soji <address@concealed>]

Hi,

It was fixed:
    
https://sourcesup.renater.fr/scm/viewvc.php?view=revision&root=sympa&revision=9249


However, currently Lock::lock() locks _lock file_, not the file
passed to Lock::new().  So lock files can not be removed as long as
any processes are running.

Is this behavior unnecessary, isn't it?

Regards,


On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:03:52 +0100
David Verdin <address@concealed> wrote:

> Hi Soji,
> 
> I'll have a look at this problem, though I didn't meet it yet.
> 
> regards,
> 
> David
> 
> Le 13/02/13 05:47, IKEDA Soji a e'crit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have realized that one of two "spooler.pl" processes occasionally
> > fails to start.
> >
> > There seems to be a conflict with shared lock: Both processes get
> > lock almost simultaneously, then one of them removes lock file, and
> > finally another process dies because it fails to remove the same
> > lock file.
> >
> > I could not find out how to fix this problem.  Would you please
> > investigate it?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > -- Soji
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> A bug in Sympa? Quick! To the bug tracker!
> <https://sourcesup.renater.fr/tracker/?atid=167&group_id=23&func=browse>
>       David Verdin
> Services Applicatifs aux Utilisateurs
> Tel. +33 2 23 23 69 71
> GIP RENATER <http://www.renater.fr>
> 


-- 
株式会社 コンバージョン  セキュリティ&OSSソリューション部   池田荘児
〒231-0004　神奈川県横浜市中区元浜町3-21-2 ヘリオス関内ビル7F
e-mail address@concealed  TEL 045-640-3550
http://www.conversion.co.jp/