Developers of Sympa

[Guillaume Rousse <address@concealed>]

Le 10/04/2013 14:41, address@concealed a écrit :
> Revision
>     9082
> Author
>     sikeda
> Date
>     2013-04-10 14:41:16 +0200 (mer. 10 avril 2013)
>
>
>       Log Message
>
> [bug][#8066] [Submitted by X. Bachelot] FSF had moved.
Which is yet another reason to restart a discussion I once suggested: do 
we really need to have so much duplicated informations in every file, 
whereas a simple reference to a centralised verbatim copy of license, 
copyright and authorship information would be enough ?

That's just ugly to have 16 lines of legal information, whose usefulness 
is not even proved, for a single line of code, such as  src/Makefile.am 
file (sympa-cleanup branch) case, for instance.

I've just checked automake source file, they refer to FSF web site, 
which offers better perenity garanties than a postal address:
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

--
Guillaume Rousse
INRIA, Direction des systèmes d'information
Domaine de Voluceau
Rocquencourt - BP 105
78153 Le Chesnay
Tel: 01 39 63 58 31

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME