Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: Olivier Salaun - CRU <address@concealed>
- To: Mark Valiukas <address@concealed>
- Cc: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: categorisation
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:12:43 +0100
Hi Mark,
1. Since your summary includes both text/plain and text/html parts, we think it should become the default summary format. It means
that you shouldn't have to add an extra reception_mode (there are too many of them) and you don't have to manage extra
@tabrcpthtmlsummary
I had thought about that. The reason I thought an extra delivery type was warranted was that I didn't want to break existing functionality.
With a single summary delivery type, if a listmaster uses the html template then there is no option for recipients to get a
text-only summary. It's not important to most of my users, but I think some people may be upset about having multipart/alternate
messages forced on them.
It makes sense
[....]
2. You should define a subroutine that htmlizes variables ('&' changed to '&'...)
I think an extra sub in tools.pl would be an appropriate place, if you have no objections.
Maybe the &tools::escape_html() could be extended to perform this job.
The people who asked for this functionality want even more.
The next stage I'm working on is categorisation of messages based on moderation and/or keywords in the subject line.
We had this kind of feature in mind for Sympa, but nothing started yet.
This is so people will need to read even less of the summary in order to get the information they need - e.g. people could
skip past an "Acting Appointments" section, and focus on a "Lectures and Seminars" section. What has been asked for is
a mini-newsletter, in essence, with community input and automatic categorisation which can be overridden by a moderator.
[...]
Important points on this:
- categorisation will only occur if the list is a categorised one
Ok
- categorisation will occur automatically based on keywords in the subject line, and/or moderator input (will require wwsympa and
mail command alterations)
Ok
- an extra message header will be inserted to define the category
It should allow "classicaly" subscribed users (ie not in digest mode) to filter messages based on this header, which was the main usage we had for categorisation.
- Extra hashes will be populated by the digest processing stuff, and passed with $param. These will identify which categories will be
used in a particular summary, and which messages belong in each category.
Great.
List owners will have to populate a list of categories for their list via the web interface. The moderation web interface should propose a menu to choose the category for a message. It could be usefull to separate category IDs from category title ; this could make subject tagging easier and would allow internationalization (if required).
How do you imagine message authors would indicate a category in the message subject ?
For subscribers that don't have filterring facilities in their mail user agent, Sympa could propose categories of interrest to limit the messages sent to a subscriber.
If you have question about the code design...
--
Olivier Salaun
Comite Reseau des Universites
-
Re: [sympa-users] Adding a delivery type - html_summary - patches for 4.0b2,
Mark Valiukas, 02/17/2004
-
Re: categorisation,
Olivier Salaun - CRU, 02/18/2004
-
Re: categorisation,
Mark Valiukas, 02/18/2004
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Re: categorisation,
Olivier Salaun - CRU, 02/18/2004
-
Re: [sympa-dev] categorisation,
Mark Valiukas, 02/19/2004
- Re: [sympa-dev] categorisation / code design, Olivier Salaun - CRU, 02/20/2004
- Re: [sympa-dev] Re: [sympa-dev] categorisation, Chris Hastie, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [sympa-dev] categorisation,
Mark Valiukas, 02/19/2004
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Re: categorisation,
Olivier Salaun - CRU, 02/18/2004
-
Re: categorisation,
Mark Valiukas, 02/18/2004
-
Re: categorisation,
Olivier Salaun - CRU, 02/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.