Developers of Sympa

["Adam Bernstein" <address@concealed>]

Sorry, cancel this -- I just did some more testing and discovered
that the reply-to on digests works the same way as regular messages.

Sorry for my confusion!

    ab
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*           Electric Embers:  Powering the fires of change           *
* Web, Email, List, and Antivirus/Antispam hosting for the community *
*  http://electricembers.net   Member of http://techunderground.org  *
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Bernstein [mailto:address@concealed]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 3:22 PM
> To: address@concealed
> Subject: [sympa-dev] Reply-to for digests?
> 
> 
> Sympa team --
> 
> Is there any reason why the reply-to for digests is set to the
> listname-request address, instead of using the same setting as
> the reply-to for the list (for example)?  People often want to
> easily reply to something they read in a digest, and this makes
> it difficult.  I guess if you reply to an attached message within
> a digest, that might work, but at the moment I'm dealing with
> people using plaintext email clients, not MIME.  So it's the
> digest message itself that they want to reply to.
> 
>      ab
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> *           Electric Embers:  Powering the fires of change           *
> * Web, Email, List, and Antivirus/Antispam hosting for the community *
> *  http://electricembers.net   Member of http://techunderground.org  *
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>