Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
- From: Harri Suutari <address@concealed>
- To: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [en@sympa] Problems with v=DMARC1; p=reject;
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 15:55:42 +0200
In Sympa, the workaround is to add "dmarc_protection.mode
dmarc_reject"
to sympa.conf
.
However, this causes all information about the original sender
of the email to be lost, and the recipient can only reply to the
list.
"Previous values of the From:
header field and the
DKIM signature are saved
in an X-Original-From:
and X-Original-DKIM-Signature:
header fields
for later inspection." -
https://www.sympa.community/manual/customize/dmarc-protection.html
The syntax of new From: can be formatted differently. I prefer
"name_email_via_list" which at least with Thunderbird shows clear
information where the email actually came from.
See
https://www.sympa.community/gpldoc/man/sympa_config.5.html#dmarc_protection
:
"dmarc_protection.phrase
New From name format
- Format:
display_name
- “Name”name_and_email
- “Name” (e-mail)name_via_list
- “Name” (via List)name_email_via_list
- “Name” (e-mail via List)list_for_name
- “List” (on behalf of Name)list_for_email
- “List” (on behalf of e-mail)
-
Default:
name_via_list
-
Context:
list (
config
), domain (robot.conf
), site (sympa.conf
)
This is the format to be used for the sender name part of the new From header field."
How can I restore the sender’s address in the header so that the recipient can reply directly to them?
Try setting the Reply address to 'user'. Maybe you have it set to
'list' currently?
It's a pity that many receiving SMTP servers still do not check
and respect the ARC signature chain.
-
[en@sympa] Problems with v=DMARC1; p=reject;,
Ralph Ballier, 03/29/2025
- Re: [en@sympa] Problems with v=DMARC1; p=reject;, Harri Suutari, 03/29/2025
- Re: [en@sympa] Problems with v=DMARC1; p=reject;, John Levine, 03/29/2025
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.