Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

en - Re: [sympa-users] Sympa 6.1.9 (and older): reply_to_header sender, apply force - BUG?

Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Marcin Wołoszyn <address@concealed>
  • To: address@concealed
  • Subject: Re: [sympa-users] Sympa 6.1.9 (and older): reply_to_header sender, apply force - BUG?
  • Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:57:00 +0200

Hi Marcin,

Thanks for this bug fix. I applied it to the 6.1 branch and it will be
integrated to the 6.1.10 tag. Coming soon!

Best regards,

David

It is great to hear that.

By the way, I'd like to ask - have there been some changes in session handling mechanism recently? I noticed strange behavior since 6.1.7 (we are using 6.1.9) which occurs as not keeping session in wwsympa web application.

Lets say - Im administering it, I create some list, then I go to new list administration page - I get:

modal error:
ERROR (admin) - "You must log in" (translation might be different),

and below:
To perform an operation requiring your email address you must log in

but why - I got automatically logged out, while I should be still logged in. Since the moment, using this browser session does not allow me to log into Sympa - when I log in, the next page shows im not, then I click "sympa home page", it shows that im logged in, next click on "sympa home page" - and Im automatically logged out. Session keeping does not work. When I look into Request / Response headers I see:

Request headers:

Cookie: SESSe166[...]hrd5; SESS34e31[...]3gsem; [...] sympa_session=40[...]04; sympa_session=68[...]27

Response headers:

Set-Cookie: sympa_session=86[...]76;

It is weird - why am I having two sympa_session parameters inside cookie? (Im using Google Chrome Beta)
Problem is quite annoying, my workaround is to open new incognito window and log in. We plan to switch authentication to CAS so the problem as I suppose will solve itself for us, but the issue is disturbing.


The other thing - is it possible to add a feature?
When a message gets to moderation, there are two possibilities:
- send
- reject
we would like to have two more options:
- reject (quiet)
- bounce (with additional field of an email address where the message should be bounced to)


--
Best regards,
MW


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Kryptograficzna sygnatura S/MIME




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page