The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa

[Liam Kirsher <address@concealed>]

David,

That didn't seem to fix the problem.

I noticed that the Errors-to field was set incorrectly to
address@concealed (instead of lists.virtualhost.com),
which I think resulted in a bad Return-Path field, as well.
In List.pm distribute_msg() there appeared to be a discrepancy between
how $host was referenced.  The X-Loop string comes out correct in the
email message, but the Errors-to one is incorrect.
>  ## Add useful headers
>     $hdr->add('X-Loop', "$name\@$host");
>     $hdr->add('X-Sequence', $sequence);
>     $hdr->add('Errors-to', $name.&Conf::get_robot_conf($robot,
> 'return_path_suffix').'@'.$host);
>
Results in message:
> Return-Path: <address@concealed>
<.....>
> X-Loop: address@concealed
> X-Sequence: 39
> Errors-to: address@concealed
I think that should be \@$host in the Errors-to line, shouldn't it?

Liam


David Verdin wrote:
> Liam,
>
> Yes there is a "host" parameter in robot.conf.
> See: https://www.sympa.org/manual/virtual-hosts?#robot.conf
> Its normal default value is the name of the directory of the virtual
> host. However, it seems that there could be a problem - with the
> "reply-to" only.
> If you set it in your robot.conf, can you tell me if it solves the
> problem? If it does, then there is a bug (which should not be too hard
> to fix).
>
> Regards,
>
> Liam Kirsher a écrit :
>> David,
>>
>> Are you referring to the "http_host" robot parameter? Those seem to be
>> correct.  Or, is there a "host" parameter?
>> I don't have those in any of the robot files.
>>
>> Liam
>>
>> David Verdin wrote:
>>  
>>> On second thought : Lists initialize their domain name using the
>>> "host" robot parameter. So it may be the reverse problem: host (robot)
>>> parameter badly defined or not defined at all (which would lead to use
>>> defaults).
>>>
>>> Liam Kirsher a écrit :
>>>    
>>>> Hi --
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone tell me what's going on?
>>>>
>>>> On lists that have the reply_to_header set to 'list', the Reply-To:
>>>> field is using the server's fqdn, when it should be using the virtual
>>>> domain.  Any idea where I go to fix this?
>>>> I recently moved over to a different server, and am using 5.3.4.
>>>>
>>>> Example:
>>>>
>>>> To: address@concealed
>>>> From: address@concealed
>>>> Subject: [listname] Is this list active?
>>>> Reply-To: address@concealed
>>>> X-Loop: address@concealed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>
>>>> Liam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>
>>   
>

-- 
Liam Kirsher
PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/