Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
re: [sympa-users] Intergrating Sympa with Proofpoint
- From: Flack Maguire <address@concealed>
- To: Chris Andrews <address@concealed>, "address@concealed" <address@concealed>
- Subject: re: [sympa-users] Intergrating Sympa with Proofpoint
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:10:00 -0700
Hi Chris,
I am just following
the Sympa listserve at this time and have
no indepth knowledge on Sympa at all (hope
to some day). However, I can speak
smartly about outsourcing the spam filter
portion. I have just finished vetting
this space for a solution for one of my clients.
What I found was basically three tier 1 spam
filter services.
They are:
MessageLabs ( http://www.messagelabs.com/
)
MX Logic ( http://www.mxlogic.com/
)
Postini
Note that Postini
was recently acquired by Google and now offers
their service at a highly affordable price.
You can see that at this link:
Although Postini
is so well priced now, I suspect that you
can not go that wrong with any of these three.
I will know a whole lot more in the next
year as we test all three platforms.
I have nothing hard to place this on, but
my gut feeling after talking to reps
at all three companies was that MX Logic
would likely be the most flexible in tweaking
to your needs in case something special arose
in using their service in combination with
Sympa. The contact at MessageLabs seemed
very upfront about their strengths.
He felt that MX Logic led them some in their
user interface tools but that there underlying
filtering technology was a couple of steps
ahead of the other tier 1 players and far
ahead of the tier 2 players. With all
that said, I will be the first to say that
teasing out hard truth from sales pitch can
certainly be challenging at times.
There are a number
of tier 2 players as well as companies that
are taking some of the hardware solutions
(Barracuda, IronPort, etc.) and offering
an outsourced solution based on that hardware.
I typically always take my clients to the
best choice in the tier 2 because I find
that the huge gains in access to the company
and their flexibility typically outweigh
the advantages that the tier 1 players have
in a larger feature set, etc.
But, when it comes
to spam filtering, I found myself concluding
that it really comes down to the companies
with the largest scale that have the
best advantage. Even more specifically, I
would bet that it really boils down
to the company that can afford the best math
and linguistic experts for fighting spam.
I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Flack
>>Has anyone
done this?
>>We have just put in a Proofpoint cluster in front of our mail cluster
>>(CommuniGate Pro). Currently I am using MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin on my
>>Sympa server to score SPAM message and the SpamHause XBL with Sendmail to
>>reject senders. I want to get out of the SPAM filtering (and AntiVirus
>>scanning) if possible. That would reduce the number of applications that I
>>have to manage and update on the listserv.
>>---
>> Chris Andrews
>> Boston College
>> Collaboration Team
>> 617-552-6365
>>We have just put in a Proofpoint cluster in front of our mail cluster
>>(CommuniGate Pro). Currently I am using MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin on my
>>Sympa server to score SPAM message and the SpamHause XBL with Sendmail to
>>reject senders. I want to get out of the SPAM filtering (and AntiVirus
>>scanning) if possible. That would reduce the number of applications that I
>>have to manage and update on the listserv.
>>---
>> Chris Andrews
>> Boston College
>> Collaboration Team
>> 617-552-6365
-
[sympa-users] Intergrating Sympa with Proofpoint,
Chris Andrews, 03/13/2008
- re: [sympa-users] Intergrating Sympa with Proofpoint, Flack Maguire, 03/14/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.