Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
Re: [sympa-users] mail confirmation is NOT equivalent to password authentication
- From: Peter Farmer <address@concealed>
- To: address@concealed
- Cc: Olivier Salaün - CRU <address@concealed>
- Subject: Re: [sympa-users] mail confirmation is NOT equivalent to password authentication
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:25:22 +0800
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 11:54 pm, Olivier Salaün - CRU wrote:
> That's a known problem we have for the sending process. Things are
> complicated because the mail distribution process is delegated by
> wwsympa to the sympa.pl process ;
yeah, I noticed that, while watching debugging output in the syslog 8-)
> therefore wwsympa leaves the message
> as a file in the msg/ spool. What we need is assert sympa.pl that the
> author of the message has been properly authenticated.
Dont have a good enough grip on the code to offer any properly considered
approaches yet, but how does posting via SSL with a user certificate for
authentication work? . Havent tried it yet, but the doco and code both
imply that a message posted from an SSL login with a cert is considered as
properly authenticated ?. Or is it broken too ?
> I realize that we don't have an entry for this bug in our tracking
> system, please add one :
> http://sourcesup.cru.fr/tracker/?group_id=23
done
Thanks,
Peter Farmer.
-
[sympa-users] mail confirmation is NOT equivalent to password authentication,
Peter Farmer, 08/22/2006
-
Re: [sympa-users] mail confirmation is NOT equivalent to password authentication,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 08/22/2006
- Re: [sympa-users] mail confirmation is NOT equivalent to password authentication, Peter Farmer, 08/22/2006
-
Re: [sympa-users] mail confirmation is NOT equivalent to password authentication,
Olivier Salaün - CRU, 08/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.