Subject: The mailing list for listmasters using Sympa
List archive
- From: Sergiy Zhuk <address@concealed>
- To: elijah <address@concealed>
- Cc: "address@concealed" <address@concealed>
- Subject: Re: [sympa-users] performance bottlenecks?
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:03:25 -0800 (PST)
hi
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, elijah wrote:
> As load on sympa increases, what factors limit performance the most? Do
I'll be mostly talking about sympa 3.3.x, since some of the issues maybe
fixed already.
CPU/RAM is an issue because of list config caching.
Incoming mail processing is an issue if you stop sympa even for a short
period of time on a high trafficed site.
Backlog processing usually takes a lot of time since it's done by a single
sympa process.
Web server is an issue too, especially if user runs mhonarc search via sympa
GUI.
Also, every web process will have a full cache of all lists, which is a
huge amount of memory (hundreds of Mb) if you have several thousand lists.
It takes a lot of time to fill that cache when the process starts.
> ram. My impulse would be to first put wwsympa on its own machine with
> lots of ram and a fast processor and put everything else (including
> sql and disk storage) on another box.
Only if you share configs and archives via NFS.
Otherwise wwsympa can't leave on a separate machine.
> One person in the FAQ entry on clustering sympa suggests offloading
> outgoing SMTP to another machine.
This is definitely worth it since you will cut back the IO, RAM and CPU
usage on the machine, where sympa is running.
--
rgds,
serge
-
performance bottlenecks?,
elijah, 04/01/2003
- Re: [sympa-users] performance bottlenecks?, Sergiy Zhuk, 04/01/2003
- Re: [sympa-users] performance bottlenecks?, Olivier Salaun - CRU, 04/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.