Developers of Sympa

[Marc Chantreux <address@concealed>]

hello people,

hackathonians: many thanks for the last day. we made some very
constructive decisions we need to report on the devel list.

i clean the cups up, take a shower and come back but first i would like
to share with you about some goals of the day:

* sympatic utf8 policy
    * at least the pros and cons
    * without coming back with the "| sendmail" again as we should use
      Email::* anyway
* sympatic exception policy in sympatic
    as i said: my first intend was to use Try::Tiny (because Dancer do
    that) but ...
    * AFAIK: at the end of the try/catch, there is no way to know
      if an exception was rised
    * $_ as exception in the catch block looks a terrible idea to me
    * AFAIK there is no exception stack
      * Olivier mentioned it as a cool feature
      * i already heard this argument in a perl conference
    * for the moment, i see die/eval/if $@ as the best strategy
      but i have no strong opinion


* AFAI(understood), we're finally agree about giving a try autodie.
  was that right ? (the special cases (no autodie+eval should be
  documented)).

* Introduction of Email::*

also, i'll create an issue "don't rise errno by the hand" and
we should be agree about the refactoring tags i proposed yesterday
(if you think it's a good idea). I see 2 of them for now

    * CTCS: closer to coding style (also includes moo/sympatization)
      (coding style has to be written)
    * DOUT: deletation of Optimistic Undef Return

those tags should be considered as LGTM if the patch actually does this
job.