Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: David Verdin <address@concealed>
- To: address@concealed
- Subject: Re: [sympa-developpers] ugly code
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:04:33 +0200
Le 22/07/13 14:53, Guillaume Rousse a
écrit :
address@concealed">In Sympa::site::-) I love the way we can speak to each other without fearing ego fights. I see it as a sign of good health for the Sympa project. address@concealed"> Unless there is a class relationship between Sympa::List, Sympa::Family, Sympa::Robot and Sympa::Site, those methods should be defined separatly in those different classes, and should not spend CPU cycles testing if they have been invoked on a correct instance.That seems to make sense, however I don't remember the exact relationship between these classes. If I remember correctly, list and Robot both inherit Site. i don't think Family inherits anything. address@concealed">Agreed too, We tend to use it more and more but we there are probably still some code like this here and there; We'll track them down ASAP. --
A bug in Sympa? Quick! To the bug tracker!
|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
-
[sympa-developpers] ugly code,
Guillaume Rousse, 07/22/2013
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] ugly code,
David Verdin, 07/22/2013
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] ugly code,
Guillaume Rousse, 07/22/2013
- Re: [sympa-developpers] ugly code, David Verdin, 07/22/2013
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] ugly code,
Guillaume Rousse, 07/22/2013
-
Re: [sympa-developpers] ugly code,
David Verdin, 07/22/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.