Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

devel - [sympa-dev] DKIM Compliance and the Sender: header

Subject: Developers of Sympa

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: address@concealed
  • To: address@concealed
  • Subject: [sympa-dev] DKIM Compliance and the Sender: header
  • Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:33:33 -0800

Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:32:21 -0800
From: address@concealed
To: address@concealed
Cc: address@concealed
Subject: Re: [sympa-Bugs][3523] DKIM Compliance
In-Reply-To: <address@concealed>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

Hello Serge,

I believe that we added a "Sender" header because our mail was being rejected
by Hotmail.

As for the possibility that Sympa will break DKIM in another fashion... this
is something that we should double-check on our servers.

Thanks!
Charles


On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:15:53PM +0000, address@concealed wrote:
> Bugs item #3523, was opened at 2007-11-18 17:09
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://sourcesup.cru.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=167&aid=3523&group_id=23
> Or by replying to this e-mail entering your response between the following
> markers:
> #+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+
> (enter your response here)
> #+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+
>
> Status: Open
> Priority: 3
> Submitted By: Charles Paul (epsas)
> Assigned to: Nobody (None)
> Summary: DKIM Compliance
> : None
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Resolution: None
> Platform:
>
>
> Initial Comment:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-00
> >From the IETF draft document section 5.1 on Mailing List Managers:
>
> ??
> 5.1. Mailing List Manager Actions
>
> Mailing List Managers should make every effort to ensure that
> messages that they relay and which have Valid Signatures upon receipt
> also have Valid Signatures upon retransmission. In particular,
> Mailing List Managers that modify the message in ways that break
> existing signatures SHOULD:
> ...
> o Add a Sender header field using a valid address pointing back to
> the Mailing List Administrator or an appropriate agent (such as an
> "owner-" or a "-request" address).
> ??
>
> There is a bunch of other stuff that SHOULD be done, but for now, adding a
> Sender: header is the most important.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >Comment By: Serge Aumont (serge.aumont)
> Date: 2008-11-18 15:15
>
> Message:
> In many other cases Sympa modify the message in way that break DKIM
> signature :
> -subject encoding
> -subject tags
> -message header or footer
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You can respond by visiting:
> http://sourcesup.cru.fr/tracker/?func=detail&atid=167&aid=3523&group_id=23


----- End forwarded message -----


  • [sympa-dev] DKIM Compliance and the Sender: header, epsas, 11/18/2008

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page