Developers of Sympa

[Adam Bernstein <address@concealed>]

> I see no obvious reason why you wouldn't want to make that function 
> available for command messages (as opposed to distributed list 
> messages), and looking in the code, I think the cause is simply that the 
> full message is not retained in the sequence of function calls involved 
> in processing a command.  

Well, I have succeeded in passing the message through all the necessary 
calls so that subscribe (and all other) scenarios can all use SMTP header 
matching for rule conditions.  However, I've hit another problem: If you're 
trying to match Received: headers, the code only checks the first (ie. most 
recent) Received: header for a match, and then it stops looking.  So if 
you're looking for a match somewhere further back in the SMTP chain, it 
always fails.

Any easy way to fix that?

     ab