Subject: Developers of Sympa
List archive
- From: "Gildas PERROT" <address@concealed>
- To: <address@concealed>
- Cc: <address@concealed>
- Subject: RE: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:46:46 +0200
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : address@concealed [mailto:address@concealed]
> Envoyé : vendredi 15 juin 2001 15:36
> À : Gildas PERROT
> Cc : address@concealed
> Objet : Re: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa
>
>
> Gildas PERROT wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if the following functionnalities that I
> would like to
> > get with Sympa are considered interesting and with good
> priority (BTW, it
> > would be interesting to have the list of projects in the
> priority order on
> > the web, more precisely than "in the future" section) :
> We don't want the give a detailled list of futur development. It would be
> false.
> Only major changes are listed and they are not ordered.
>
> > - template for review and all commands for which it misses
> > - possibility to specify to the user that he is already
> subscribed when he
> > tries to subscribe again
> > - possibility to specify to the user that he is not subscribed
> when he tries
> > to unsubscribe or to distribute on a private list
> > - option to not send an email to the sender of a mail to the list
>
> All those modification are easy to do.
Great ! Does it mean we will see them in a closed future ?
> > - replace "mail" by "standard" in the review output for reception mode
>
> We will not do this. "standard" may confuse with "default" and the defaut
> can choosed for each list.
I think "mail" is not a good choice since the reception mode is mail in all
cases anyway.
Furthermode, I saw in the WWS (/wws/suboptions/<liste> link) that "normal"
is used instead of "mail". I think it would be a better choice (I thought
"normal" when I write "standard" ;-). Could you change that ?
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Serge Aumont Comité Réseaux des Universités
> Campus Beaulieu
> 35042 Rennes Cedex +33 2 998 471 47
>
-
Proposals for Sympa,
Gildas PERROT, 06/14/2001
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa,
Aumont, 06/15/2001
- RE: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa, Gildas PERROT, 06/15/2001
- RE: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa, Gildas PERROT, 06/18/2001
- RE: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa (could I have an anwser, please ?), Gildas PERROT, 06/22/2001
-
Re: [sympa-dev] Proposals for Sympa,
Aumont, 06/15/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.